Overseas markets could be harming forests in the U.S. Demand for wood pellets for biomass energy has increased dramatically around the world, especially in Europe where burning wood is treated as renewable energy and heavily subsidized.
The UK-based company Drax Group plans to build a 450,000-ton-per-year wood pellet plant in Longview.
Peter Riggs, director of the Washington state-based nonprofit Pivot Point, said the region has a productive wood sector. “This new wood pellet plant proposed for Longview is very different,” Riggs pointed out. “First of all, it’s not for the domestic market, it’s not making pellets for home stoves. It represents a substantial and entirely new source of wood fiber demand for export.”
Riggs said much of the biomass would be bound for Asia. His organization signed a letter, along with more than 100 others in the U.S. and Canada, calling for the European Union to stop incentivizing wood burning as renewable energy.
Laura Haight, U.S. policy director for the Partnership for Policy Integrity, said despite its label as renewable energy, burning wood from forests is one of the worst activities for the environment. It releases emissions when burned and removes trees that store carbon. Haight’s organization also signed the letter to the European Union, urging it to no longer classify forest biomass as renewable. “It’s the money that’s driving this system,” Haight asserted. “If they change that policy, then this will no longer be subsidized, and we can see a better future for our forests and our climate.”
Riggs noted solar and wind energy were subsidized, and the costs have gone down dramatically. However, the same is not true for forest biomass. He emphasized plant operators have struggled to reduce the costs involved in sourcing, transporting, and burning biomass fuels.
“If they’re going to subsidize it, you kind of got to subsidize it forever,” Riggs contended. “But with wind and solar, those are already cost-competitive.”
(Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash)